Are you saying the LBNA lsit should NOT have archives?
Or just making ocnversation? (grin)
Mama Stork
aka Pam in Cinci
You know, there are options for talk lists to have no archives. I know
of a couple off hand (off list information provided only upon
request)for some reasons depending on the subject material discussed I
think that it's a good idea not to have archives. Just IMHO.
phyto
currently in a snow-hole
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Phyto-clarification??RE: [LbNA] Black Hole
2 messages in this thread |
Started on 2003-12-15
Phyto-clarification??RE: [LbNA] Black Hole
From: Pam Kleingers (pam@kleingers.net) |
Date: 2003-12-15 16:12:03 UTC-05:00
Re: Phyto-clarification??RE: [LbNA] Black Hole
From: Phyto (phyto_me@yahoo.com) |
Date: 2003-12-15 22:19:42 UTC
--- In letterbox-usa@yahoogroups.com, "Pam Kleingers"
wrote: >...Or just making ocnversation? (grin)
just making conversation
Just a note of interest... In no way suggesting that this is
something that I support/condone just that it is (one of the many)
option(s) for a list.
:-)
Phyto
wrote: >...Or just making ocnversation? (grin)
just making conversation
Just a note of interest... In no way suggesting that this is
something that I support/condone just that it is (one of the many)
option(s) for a list.
:-)
Phyto